Loading
Showing posts with label pornography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pornography. Show all posts

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Porn studio searching Palin’s look-alike for adult film

A porn studio in Los Angeles is searching for a Sarah Palin look-alike for shooting an adult movie.

For this purpose, the studio has published online advertisements on the Los Angeles webpage of sales and social networking site Craig's List.

The ads state that the woman to portray US Republican vice-presidential candidate in the movie will earn from $2,000 to $3,000 for the role.

"Looking for a Sarah Palin look-alike for an adult film to be shot in next 10 days," a newspaper quoted the ad as saying.

"Please send pictures, statistics etc. ASAP," it added.

The newspaper report hints that the studio hails from Los Angeles'' San Fernando Valley region, which is also home to Warner Bros, NBC Universal, The Walt Disney Company, Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network.

by ibnlive.com

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Sunday, August 31, 2008

In Pics: Hot & Sexy Kim Kardashian in Bikini

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Helen Mirren's porn film released after 30-yr ban


Although, it was subsequently released in the US, officials banned the film because of its gratuitous content.

A pornographic version of the 1970s Roman epic Caligula that has been banned in Britain for almost 30 years has finally been given the green light by censors.

The controversial Roman epic was scripted by the writer and historian Gore Vidal and featured a host of stars including Helen Mirren, Peter O'Toole and Sir John Gielgud. The film was derided by many as "insanely pornographic".

So he secretly filmed graphic real sex scenes performed by porn stars and inserted them into the final edit.It was meant to be an historical drama, detailing the excesses of the third Roman emperor Caligula, whose rule from 37-41AD was dominated by violence and debauchery.

However, founder of pornographic magazine Penthouse, Bob Guccione, who produced and financed the film, felt it did not contain enough sex.The film received a short run in the US but was never shown in Britain, after being banned by the British Board of Film Classification.